Top misconception about patient monitoring system companies in Jordan
Healthcare digitization has advanced rapidly during the last decade. Emerging technology has sped up medication development and healthcare delivery. COVID-19 has accelerated this as providers shift to new care delivery models and researchers resort to virtual clinical trials. The Patient Monitoring System has been a constant at the heart of these changes. Nonetheless, despite its many advantages, remote patient monitoring has not been widely used. There are certain misunderstandings regarding its efficacy, cost, and security.
As the patient experience changes, hospitals and doctors search for ways to improve communication and patient satisfaction – both in the hospital and between visits. Patient monitoring system companies recognize that communications technology is an essential element of the equation, but they have limited resources and many alternatives. Not long ago, telemedicine meant healthcare given over the phone. Today, it may refer to anything from virtual visits to file sharing to remote care management and mobile health applications.
Here are common misconceptions about the patients monitoring system companies.
1- It’s Expensive
Patients seem that remote care management solutions are expensive. RCM down the healthcare cost by following ways:-
- Reduces unnecessary visits:- Patient monitoring system companies allow patients to remotely monitor their health, including heart rate, blood pressure, sugar level, and other vitals, without going to the doctor’s clinic. These applications significantly lower the frequency of unnecessary hospital readmissions since doctors may prescribe care based on the gathered biometrics and engage with patients through phone, videoconferencing, interactive voice response, and other means.
- Improve communication:- Doctors may be unable to provide appropriate care due to a lack of sufficient self-disclosure, geographical obstacles, and high patient travel expenses. Patient monitoring system companies eliminate all these factors to improve the communication between patients and doctors. Doctors can detect illnesses earlier, give more effective treatment, and, as a result, prevent readmissions, lowering healthcare expenditures.
2- It is not secure
It’s a misconception that remote care management is not secure. Patient monitoring system companies built applications according to the HIPAA compliant that is secure for patients. These applications are safe and have become more popular.
Misconceptions and a lack of information should not prevent healthcare professionals from implementing technology that enables genuinely linked care. Users will demand the same degree of connectedness in all parts of their everyday lives as consumer technology improves, including healthcare technology.
3- Technology is too complex
More and more people seem to think that the technology used in these applications is too complex, but this doesn’t seem right. The technology used in this application is user-friendly, has an easy access interface, and offers analytical data features to improve healthcare delivery.
4- It does not have excellent patient outcomes
It is frequently claimed that remote care management does not improve patient outcomes. However, this is not true. These applications allow patients to manage their health. On the other hand, doctors closely monitor their patient’s health. Quality care is not limited to urban areas. In remote regions, this application quickly provides quality care to patients. By involving patients, doctors may encourage them to accept health recommendations and provide them with the information to make educated health decisions.
5- It eliminates the human element
A common misconception is that it eliminated the human element, but this is not true. Remote care management strongly built the relationship between the doctors and patients. Patients learn to manage their health while trusting the doctor and doctor delivered quality care while trusting in patients’ ability to manage their health. A strong relationship between the patients and doctors can lead to better quality care.
6- It is inferior to physical examinations
Physical examination is indeed essential for the doctor to take information about the patient’s health. But Remote care management inferior to physical examination is not true. That’s why patient monitoring companies allow patients to monitor their health, including heart rate, blood pressure, sugar level, weight, physical activity, etc.
It also results in a fast response by care providers. There will be no long waits at clinics or dealing with doctor shortages. Patients can receive reminders about medicine, food, sleep, stress reduction, and other topics through remote care management.
7- It raises the possibility of malpractice
Malpractice risks occur both with and without remote care management. Proper communication, creating a suitable doctor-patient relationship, recording enough patient medical data, maintaining data privacy and security, and achieving high standards of care can all help to reduce the likelihood of malpractice litigation. Patient monitoring system companies should also get acquainted entirely with telemedicine legislation to minimize the potential of misconduct.